 Clone this issue
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
|
Issue Links:
|
Duplicate
|
|
|
|
This issue is duplicated by:
|
|
|
CODEBASE-150 solr facet fields should be in the request handler, not arguments in the URL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naomi said (post to blacklight-devel lis Aug 3, 2009)
"Fedora (the Digital Object Repository, not RedHat) G-Search seems to
use a field called "pid" as the unique identifier.
"We are trying to run Blacklight on top of a fedora instance that is
using Fedora --> G-search. Blacklight makes assumptions that the
unique id for a SOLR document is named "id". This conflicts with
Fedora's notion of "pid" as the unique identifier for an object ...
which is then pushed into G-Search ... blah blah.
"One solution is to make a copyfield called "id".
"But would it also make sense to avoid hardcoding "id" as a field name
for the unique identifier of SOLR documents in Blacklight?"
Erik said:
"Yes, it makes sense for Blacklight to abstract Solr's uniqueKey setting through some simple indirection."
Bess said:
"Yes, if we're asking the gsearch and active fedora people not to
assume what the unique id field is called, then we can't hard code it
either. We should definitely fix this."
|
|
Description
|
Naomi said (post to blacklight-devel lis Aug 3, 2009)
"Fedora (the Digital Object Repository, not RedHat) G-Search seems to
use a field called "pid" as the unique identifier.
"We are trying to run Blacklight on top of a fedora instance that is
using Fedora --> G-search. Blacklight makes assumptions that the
unique id for a SOLR document is named "id". This conflicts with
Fedora's notion of "pid" as the unique identifier for an object ...
which is then pushed into G-Search ... blah blah.
"One solution is to make a copyfield called "id".
"But would it also make sense to avoid hardcoding "id" as a field name
for the unique identifier of SOLR documents in Blacklight?"
Erik said:
"Yes, it makes sense for Blacklight to abstract Solr's uniqueKey setting through some simple indirection."
Bess said:
"Yes, if we're asking the gsearch and active fedora people not to
assume what the unique id field is called, then we can't hard code it
either. We should definitely fix this."
|
Show » |
|
Improvement
removed hardcode expectation for "id" field in solr document